Ryan the Lion

As we know from being around poker players and the scene, the persona we see at the table is usually a trivial portion of our opponent’s full life, or occasionally, even a completely deceptive image. Professional poker player Ryan Schnabel, who can be seen in a tank top, tie, and heart-shaped sunglasses would seem to be baring it all, but as always, so much more is still to be found.

In fact, Ryan is a man of so many talents it is hard to say what he exactly is. A poker player? A fitness guru? A voice over actor? A chef? A life coach? A nutritionist? He seems to be a bit of all these.

Just looking at him lends credence to the idea that he might know something on that score. At the even  age of forty, Ryan is dauntingly healthy. Not only does do all crooks and corners of his body seem to be buffed and perfect, it would seem he has developed muscles other people don’t even know they have. His face, hair and beard are full, healthy, and almost suspiciously vigorous. Is he lying about his age? What’s going on?

In other words, to be around Ryan is to wonder, how the hell do you do it?

It’s going to sound silly but if you take care of the little things the big picture takes care of itself. You first have to DECIDE to do something.  Just DECIDE. Make up your mind that you are going to accomplish something. Look at goals from the macro perspective and then you can break down large goals into smaller ones which is where you iron out the detailed steps to take.  It all starts with your mindset – nothing can stop the man with the right one – nothing can help the man with the wrong one.

So what was your decision? What is it you are trying to accomplish?

On a macro scale I want to bridge the knowledge gap in health, fitness, diet, and nutrition. The education system in my opinion is a massive failure. The times have changed and the systems have not. Textbooks take years to update and information can be outdated overnight.  New information is constantly being published and made available. Going to the doctor is going to be a crapshoot. You really have no idea if you’re seeing someone who is world-class or bottom of the barrel. I also think there’s a real failure on the part of the government and healthcare system in the United States. The obesity rate is pushing 40%. Diabetes is near 10% and Alzheimer’s is increasing at an alarming rate due to people living longer lives.

I want to lead people to better poker results through a better life.  I’m making the case that by increasing (their) overall health people will improve their game (via increased duration of focus, increased memory recall, increased memory formation, decreased stress levels, more efficient sleep, etc) and it will have a positive compound effect on the rest of their lives.

Sounds very worthy. But you’re also a poker player and I met you as a poker player – how did all this come about? Tell us how your past led to where you are now.

I’ve been involved with gaming and competition to varying degrees starting at a very young age.  When I was 4 or 5 Santa dropped off an Atari 2600 and it was on from there. There was ColecoVision and IntelliVision with classics like Space Invaders, Frogger, and Night

The young lion, left, with gamers and girls at Quakecon99.

Stalker. Nintendo with the Mario and Zelda line, Genesis with Sonic and Altered Beast, SNES, Nintendo GameCube and N64, Playstation, Xbox, and everything along the way. Around the time of Sega Genesis I was already on to PC gaming. I basically grew up tinkering with PCs and building my own as the technology became available. There was no Circuit City or BestBuy back in the day. My stepfather and I would go to computer shows that you’d get a flyer for in the mail. I remember my first big purchase was a 245 megabyte Maxtor Hard Drive for $245. It was a good deal.

Many gamers in poker for sure.

I tend to hyper focus on activities and I’ve gone overboard with the gaming throughout my life. At one point I was ranked amongst the top in the world at a certain FPS (First Person Shooter) game (RIP bane). This was prior to the concept of competitive video gaming with prize money – which is now known as Esports. I also played the RTS type games like Warcraft and Starcraft but I was nowhere near as skilled at those games.  

And poker?

Eventually I came across Magic:The Gathering. I ended up playing on the ProTour for a little bit and got introduced to poker through that scene. From there I ended up playing online $1/$2 Limit (NL wasn’t played). Eventually I worked my way up to the highest spread games on Stars at the time which was $30/$60 Limit. Every once in a while a special $50/$100 game would run but you had to request support to create a table (which didn’t happen often).

I was lucky enough to have a few good people help me out along the way. One friend back in the day, LastChance, beat Hellmuth HU online in limit poker. I don’t even know how many hands they played – but my friend was apparently the Limit HU end boss on Paradise Poker back in the day – shout out to LastChance you’re the man you crazy mofo. I ended up making the transition from Limit Hold Em to NL Tournament Poker. I started with single table SNGs and then moved to MTTs. I won a few donkaments back in the day, mostly small stakes, some of them 5k+ player fields, and was on Stars Top 100 Yearly TLB for a year or two.  

I heard about the SuperNova Elite program that Stars had so I decided to make the jump from NL MTTs to NL cash. I ended up being 1 of about 150 SNEs in the world that year. There were probably 20-30 of us at the stakes I was playing. I 24 tabled $200NL cash and I remember that my goal was 10,000 hands a day. I was seeing anywhere from 800-1200 hands an hour. Some of the people who I played with on a regular basis have gone on to become the biggest names in poker – Jason Mercier and Krissy Bicknell being two of them.

So you’ve been around. What do you think of that time?

In retrospect I don’t think it was a very good idea and I would never recommend for anyone to do it. There were a lot of sacrifices that I had to make in order to make SNE. It wasn’t until years later that I would become cognizant of the sacrifices I unknowingly made – my social development and overall health. I’m somewhat embarrassed about some of my previous behaviors. I’d like to say I was young and stupid but now I’m just old and stupid. Let’s say I was young, full of myself, sleep deprived, nutritionally deprived, and at times an emotional wreck.

That’s a lot of people, to be fair to yourself.

In a sense I’m glad that life has hit me pretty hard since then – it’s given me a sense of perspective.  I certainly didn’t appreciate what I had. Things came too easily to me and I got arrogant. I spent money on far too many unnecessary things. These days I try to spend my money more on experiences.  

Expand on that.

I find it difficult to summarize the sum of my experiences that’s led to this point. I feel like with the information I have it’s time that I reach back and pull people forward with me. The best way that I can explain what I’m offering to people in a poker language would be the following.

The game of poker and the game of life are the same.

I think everyone should start off with a balanced strategy. Establish a baseline then move toward exploitation. I want to help people exploiting the mind and body for peak performance by optimizing the variables for success.

So what happened next?

Fast forward to Black Friday – I’m 24 tabling and suddenly online poker is shut down.  I had no idea what I was going to do moving forward.

With Holly at Millennium Park, Chicago.

At that point I had been I had been doing CrossFit (a core strength and conditioning program) for about a year. I’ve been involved with health, fitness, and sports in varying degrees my entire life with biometric readings spanning back over 25 years.

Prior to CrossFit I had roughly 20 years of weightlifting experience and playing sports (basketball, soccer, volleyball, wrestling, skiing, and tennis mostly).

So there is a connection between the big change in online poker and your present focus.

After Black Friday I threw every ounce of energy I had into CrossFit. I learned as much as I could about as many topics as I could (I tend to obsess and deep dive on topics). I already had a pretty extensive background in anatomy/physiology and biology due to studying weightlifting and being infatuated with a Biology major, Holly, for a large part of my time in college.

I was also fortunate enough to have two incredibly intelligent affiliate owner/coaches who happen to be really good PEOPLE. I learned a mind-blowing amount of information from them and from doing self-study. They remain very close friends of mine to this very day. Hi Bill and Jennie!

With fellow fitness instructor Bill performing another of Crossfit’s controversial exercises.

So you were learning – but now you are teaching.

I love learning and sharing so I made the transition from athlete to coach. This was certainly a stretch outside of my comfort zone. I was a CrossFit athlete and coach for roughly 6 years until I got rid of 99% of everything I owned and picked up and moved out of the US to pursue online poker once again. From there I made the transition to live poker.

Back up – you were out of the country! Tell us about that.

Leaving the U.S. to live overseas was an amazing learning experience. It’s tough to even know where to start with but I’ll do my best to capture the most relevant aspects of that experience. I had been working trivial jobs to make the ends meet for a while. Now when I say trivial jobs I took an entry level job working in a manufacturing plant in a bad town (where the level of education was high school for most) to help pay the bills. Prior to that I was at a Starbucks – a fucking Starbucks. These may not seem like trivial jobs to some people but I have a degree in Computer Engineering from one of the top programs in the country (if you can believe what U.S. News and World Report says) and I had extensive experience in corporate america as Project Manager in Research and Development at a Fortune 500 company where I was the youngest person with my title by decades. I’m a high energy driven person. To say I wasn’t utilizing my skills is an understatement.

I ended up getting a job as a Sewer Safety Inspector – which paid great given the requirements – but the hours were long it was about 3-4 hours of commuting every day on top of 8 hours of work (sometimes there was overtime). I was still actively coaching and working out this entire time. I had been away from poker for some time (I really needed the mental break) and I started watching the scene again.  

I watched as my peer group from the online days racked up millions of winnings, WSOP bracelets, EPT titles, etc. It was then that I made the decision that I’m capable of those achievements as well.

I made the decision to leave the U.S. to play online poker. My experience in life has been that once you decide on something with all of your being the universe will accommodate you. You may not get what you want in the way you expected it – but you’ll get it. Every single time I’ve decided to pursue something completely the universe has responded accordingly. In 2007 when I was working a corporate job as a Project Manager I wanted to quit to play poker full-time by July. As it turns out there were massive layoffs and I got what I wanted. Seven years later in 2014 I decided that I would dedicate myself to poker again. I was laid off from that Sewer Safety Inspector job late in October 2014.

I decided on moving to Costa Rica and ended up making a bunch of mistakes that I have thankfully learned from. Without getting into too much detail I (re)learned the importance of staying balanced. I was grinding long hours online (just like old times) in Costa Rica. I fell into the same pattern of before and my nutrition went down the tubes. I did my best with exercising but ultimately I established unhealthy habits again. I had no support system there and while I was winning playing poker I was pretty much miserable in the rest of my life. It really made me take a step back from everything and evaluate what’s important to me in life. The truth of the matter is no game has the power to make you happy or unhappy. That’s an internal choice. I started to evaluate all the times in my life when I felt lost, depressed, or extremely unhappy. I noticed that there were very clear patterns. Ultimately I decided it was unhealthy for me to stay in Costa Rica so I moved back to the US. There’s no amount of money that’s worth my health and happiness – and ultimately that’s my focus – being healthy and happy.

Now you begin to enter my sphere – live poker in the U.S.

Shortly after I made the transition to live I was lucky enough to meet and befriend Fausto Valdez on the felt and from there I received coaching from Christian Soto and eventually made my way to Solve For Why Academy in December of 2016. Under the guidance of Matt Berkey, Jordan Young, and Christian Soto I’ve been able to make incredible gains in both NL cash and tournament play. I’ve continued to be a student of the game with additional material in the form of courses and webinars from Solve For Why.

The mature lion: making a run at the 2018 Borgata Winter Open, event 2.

How did Solve for Why influence you?

I had been preparing myself for success for a long time but the real catalyst which I feel helped to push me further was surrounding myself with people who have similar goals (or bigger goals) than I do – in my case that meant linking up with Solve For Why and other poker players who took the game as seriously as I did.  

Every single time I spent time with either Berk or JY in Vegas I was inspired by how hard these guys were working. It really lit a fire under my ass – it made me realize that I was capable of more. I had been settling in areas of my life instead of growing and getting outside my comfort zone. I had resources, talents, and skills at my disposal that I wasn’t using (i.e. WASTING). I’ve made it a goal to do everything I can to maximize the resources at my disposal and use what knowledge and skills I have to help others.

Ah – your decision. How are you going to help others?

I’ve sifted through the information out there. I’ve done the legwork on the studies. I’ve often used myself as a guinea pig and implemented changes in my life (like the time I tried a polyphasic sleep cycle that involved sleeping 20 minutes every 4 hours around the clock).  I want to bridge the information gap. It’s tough to know what’s true and what’s bogus with all the information out there. Studies can be conducted and conclusions can be made that can be very misleading to the unstudied eye. Often times you can just look at who funded the study and what the result is. Think about who has to gain from said information. Look to poke holes in conclusions from there.

Coincidentally there are many parallels between health/fitness and poker – for one there is NO quality control for coaches. Sure you can have some sort of certification but my experience has been that a piece of paper is just that. A piece of paper. It doesn’t mean you know what you’re talking about – it means you passed some test generally. I equate a Level 1 CrossFit Coaching certificate to a driver’s license. Lots of people have them and still plenty of people are REALLY bad at driving.

Why you? Everywhere I turn, someone is telling me they know everything about my health.

I’m simply a messenger – I don’t know everything about your health and I’ll be the first to tell you that. I’m an expert on my body and how it’ll react. With students I’ll only have information that they’re knowingly and willingly sharing with me.  

From Ryan’s social media, a personal highlight reel.

Everyone’s body is a little different – we all have things that make us different so I’m not trying to get everybody to follow the same plan. There are general guidelines but it’s completely customized to the individual’s needs. I can tell you what I’ve done (or what has worked for others) and listen to areas that you are looking to build or improve upon.

From there I can provide you with the science behind WHY I’d recommend that you do something and an action plan moving forward. I’ve been able to wade through the cesspool of information out there and separate fact from opinion. That way if a client chooses to they can read for themselves and understand the reasoning behind the actions. I want to help lead people to better lives. 

I’ve been around poker for 20 years with varying intensity and I’ve been involved with health and fitness for even longer. I can correlate the health and fitness information that is most beneficial to poker players as I’ve had to figure it out for myself!

How does this work? What can I expect from you?

I provide an initial free 10 minute consult to those who might have questions before the initial questionnaire. I’ll send you an electronic questionnaire which you’ll respond to. It’ll provide me with the most information possible so that a dialogue can begin about what your goals are and where you are at currently. From there we’ll have a 30 minute phone conversation. In that conversation we’ll have some dialogue back and forth about your answers. From there I’ll make recommendations with very explicit actions to take. I’ll summarize our conversation and send you an electronic final copy. After that point I’ll be available hourly for any follow-up.

So what do I do to get started? What’s the process? What’s next?

I can be contacted at I’ll shoot you back an email and we can go from there. I’m excited to help people on their journey. I’m also on Instagram, Twitter,  and YouTube.

Anything else?

My goal is to continue pushing my limits, getting outside of my comfort zone, to never stop learning, and lead others to a healthier lifestyle. I’ve been fortunate enough to be aligned with some good people in my life and I’ve been given many opportunities to learn and grow.

Good luck to you and those you help.


Leave a Reply

The OOP Lexicon is a user-developed poker glossary.

Absolute Position
Being last to act (e.g. closest to the button) postflop.

Advancing Leverage
Aggressive actions intended to shift the leverage point closer to the current street.

A bluff or value hand which is a natural candidate for balancing another hand because of their shared qualities, such as AA and AK; usually helps planning range splitting and line construction.

Auto profit threshold (APT)
A bluff made with positive expectation resulting from the opponent under defending vis-a-vis bet sizing. The inverse of MDF.

Choosing to support either value bets or bluffs with their converse.

A bet is a proposition.  It’s the first offer on the pot with regard to the outcome of the game. Each player, in turn, has the opportunity to lay or change the price on the pot to the rest of the players. “The language of poker.” The bet, as opposed to the raise, is most often and most easily allied to the merged pricing construction.

To remove combinations of hands from a range based on cards in your hand or on the board.

Cards which influence our combinatorial assumptions. Ex: We face resistance on T76ss while we hold As7d. Both our cards act as blockers. Our ace of spades blocks (limits) a number of flush draws our opponent could hold, while our seven blocks a number of two pair and sets our opponent could hold. *See also Block and Unblock

Blocker Bet
A small bet made by an out-of-position player.

Board Texture
The available community cards and the set of conditions which inform its relationship to a logical range.

The worst hands in a betting range.  Depending on context this could be the worst hand in a value bet range or the bluffing section of polarized range.

A range descriptor indicating a range shape with a specific high or low boundary.  A range bounded high won't contain some number of the best linear hands ranked from the top down.  This is equivalent to a "capped" range.  A range bounded low won't contain some number of the worst linear hands ranked from the bottom up.  This is often useful to describe a range that doesn't include any air or very weak hands.

A strategic mode in which a player is attempting to deny their opponent(s) equity share of the pot through aggression. Often referred to as “denying equity” or “buying up equity”.

A range is capped when it represents little to no nutted combinations as confirmed by prior action.

A continuation bet. A bet made by the player with initiative as a continuation of their initiative on a prior street.

The ability to accurately range an opponent based on all available information at a decision point.  An understanding of your hands exact equity.

Closing Action
Acting last where no subsequent action is possible behind you.  For example calling a UTG raise in the BB or calling in position postflop with no players behind.

Cold Call/Cold Bet
An action is considered “cold” when it comes from a player entering into the pot has not previously put chips voluntarily in the pot. Ex: the UTG opens, the BTN 3bets. If the SB were to call or raise, it would be a cold-call or a cold-4bet.

The branch of mathematics the deals with finite number sets. Used in poker in determining the amount of combinations of certain hands in a range.

When a blind that is not the biggest blind calls the amount of the biggest blind. Ex: At $2/$5, action folds around to the SB and the SB completes. Meaning they just call. The BB can complete when there is a straddle.

A capped range that contains only middling value hands. A range without the polarized portion.

Logical advancement of combinations across streets.

Dark Side of the Deck
The large swath of hands, often off-suit, that fall outside of conventional playable recommendations. Counter-equity hands.

Dead Money
Money in the pot that is not being fought for.  A passive player creates dead money when they call a bet preflop and looking to play fit-or-fold postflop. Dead Money is often confused with the money in the pot.

Delayed Cbet
A cbet made on the turn by the preflop raiser when the flop checked through.

Delaying Leverage
Passive actions intended to maintain a likely late street leverage point, or possibly to avoid a leverage point entirely.

A strategic break from one’s standard construction as an exploit of a particular player’s profile or construction.

Diminishing Medium Value Category
A Seidman concept in which when one’s middling value hand range is too small and transparent to our opponent and thus either that range should be shifted into the top of a polarized range or the nutted portion should be shifted into the medium value range. Ex: AQo or TT being 3bet preflop.

A cbet that is less than the preflop raise. Ex: BTN opens to $25, we 3bet to $90 from the SB, BTN calls. On the flop we cbet $70.

Dry Board
A board texture that yields relatively few logical hands value. Often containing one medium or high card and disconnected low cards. Ex: Q53r, T622r.

Dual Mentalities
A Seidman concept in which when we decide to go postflop with a weak hand against a nutted range, we should either be looking to out flop it or steal the pot away. We base our decision against the player type we are up against and never go post with both mentalities at once.

Dynamic Board
A flop texture in which the runout is very likely to change the order of top ranking hands. Ex: 954tt, 742r.

Effective Stack
The smallest stack to VPIP in a given hand. Their stack decides the amount of money that can be played for or threatened before an all-in.

Effective nuts
A value hand that can be played for stacks as if it were the actual nuts.  This is a relative hand ranking based on range assumptions and opponent type.

A measure of how well the equity of a hand is deployed. Efficiency can also be used as a measure of what is risked vs what is gained for a given bet size.

Either/Or Philosophy
A Seidman concept in which a particular street can be a very good spot for value, meaning our opponent is never folding, or a very good spot to bluff, meaning our opponent is never calling, but that those spots cannot be concurrent.

Borrowed from economics, a measure of the sensitivity of a range or hand relative to the price offered.  Ranges (or hands) described as elastic will narrow, sometimes quickly, in response to increases in price.  Those described as inelastic will not.

The percent pot share of a holding or range on any given street if the hand were to go to showdown with no further betting action.

Equity Pusher
A analytic approach to the game in which a player views the correct actions only through the lens of their hands equity vs. their opponent’s range. Often this player type has a lack of understanding of overall strategy and plays their range face up with few bluffs.

Expected Value
The mathematical formula for how much a player’s action is expected to make with their hand vs. their opponent’s range. EV = ($towin * %ofwin) - ($tolose * %ofloss)

Face Up
A player is playing their range “face up” when their actions directly correspond with their desired outcome. Ex: A player bets half-pot three streets with a range that has no bluffs. A player 3bets to 7x with JJ.

False Polarization
Otherwise known as Faux-Po; a polarizing action taken with a merged range.

The result of losing your entire table stakes. All the way down to the felt.

A call of a cbet with a weak holding with the likely intention of taking the pot away when the opponent shuts down. Often done by an in position preflop caller.

The convergence of positions, stack depths, and preceding actions at a given decision point.

A mathematical formula developed by Phil Galfond for calculating the expected value of one’s range construction vs. an opponent’s holding.

A computer programming term that means "garbage in, garbage out" which also applies to poker forums when a poster seeks an in-depth conversation about a hand, but fail to provide pertinent information such as stack sizes, bets sizes, table dynamics and player tendencies.

Game Theory
The applied science of combining mathematical models with logic to craft winning poker strategies.

Game Theory Optimal
A set of strategies is GTO if no player can unilaterally deviate and increase his average profit. ~ Will Tipton.  GTO does not mean best possible response, highest EV, or maximally exploitative play.

Implied Odds
Additional value likely to be accrued if you make your hand on a later street.

Sometimes referred to as the betting lead, a common situation in which the passive player yields to the aggressive player postflop, or the last aggressor continues betting on subsequent streets.

A bet or raise intended to force out the rest of the field in order to play heads up against a weaker opponent who has entered the pot through limping, raising, or posting the blinds.

Loose aggressive player type. Generally overused and inaccurate.

A bet made from out of position after a passive action. Often referred to as a donk bet on the flop.

He knows that I know that he knows I know.

A bet or raise that signals the hand will be played for stacks.  Within reason, it is accomplished by betting with a sizing that will create RSP equal to 1 on the following street.

Limp First In

A consecutive range of hands decreasing in strength from top to bottom; generally meaning value hands. Equivalent to "merged."

Lockdown Board
A board on which the nuts have often already been made.  More prevalent in PLO but sometimes useful in no-limit, for example on monotone flops and boards with available common straights e.g. JT9, T98, 987, etc.

1) A range of hands that includes both strong and medium value; 2) in reference to medium value; 3) the merged construction describes the natural representation of a wide range through a bet.

Mini Stop-N-Go
A Seidman concept, a line taken by a OOP PFR where flop is check/called and turn is lead.

Minimum Defense Frequency (MDF)
The necessary defending (calling/raising) frequency to prevent an opponent from auto-profiting.  The inverse of APT.

Natural Action
A check, bet, or raise which is exactly suited to a player's range and situation (e.g. a pfr's continuation bet on AK2r).

A player who will not put chips into the pot without a very strong and sometimes only nutted hand.

The best possible hand.

Nuts-To-Air Ratio (NAR)
In a polarized betting line, the ratio of value to bluff.  As used by Seidman, not limited to polarization but sometimes used to label general opponent tendency of value to bluff.

Old Man Coffee. Typically an older, retired player that likes to play bingo with ATC, but will only continue with the nuts.

The first voluntary action. The first action or bet to voluntarily enter the pot.

A bet that is more than the size of the pot.

Perceived Range
Refers to the range of hands that your opponent thinks you could have in a certain playing situation. This can be interpreted and thus misinterpreted from your playing style and position at the table.

A range consisting of very strong and very weak hands.

Post Oak Bluff
A small bluff on a late street that has little chance of winning the pot.  Generally interpreted as “gutless” in the past but now fulfilling certain functions as betting efficiencies are understood.

Positional Protection
When the strength of a range is perceived to be capped or uncapped based on which position an action is taken from.

When an action or player is perceived to have strong hands in its range.

Protection Bet
A wager which denies equity to hands which will only give action if they significantly improve; "a value bet which does not want a call."

The rejection of the offered price and the laying of a new higher price.  Raises represent a more narrow range of hands and trend towards polarization.

Range Advantage
Implementation or study tool that refers to 1) most basically, equity measurement of one range against another; 2) or also including a combination of further factors including availability of nutted hands, the nuances of the runout, and positional protection.

Range Manipulation
Deliberate line work/bet sizing made to narrow a range or keep a range wide.

Range Switch
A deliberate change in range composition made to thwart a player who is reading our range too accurately in any spot.  Reduces transparency, fights assumptions, and wins the leveling war if implemented correctly.

Ratio of Stack To Pot
RSP. The stack to pot ratio at any point in a hand, generally used post-flop as opposed to Stack to Pot Ratio.

Taking a hand to showdown and realizing its full equity.  Generally used with regard to passive actions.

The mutual exchange of chips resulting from similar play and ideas.  Reciprocity is a common bi-product of group-think.  A true edge by definition cannot be reciprocal.

Relative Position
A player’s position measured against the aggressor's position.  Generally this is used going to the flop.  For example, if UTG raises and several players call behind, calling in the big blind would give you the best relative position.  You will act after seeing how the field responds to a likely continuation from the preflop aggressor.  In the same scenario calling immediately after the preflop aggressor results in the worst relative position.  You will have to act immediately after a continuation without seeing how the remaining players will respond.  Strong relative position confers an information edge.

The ability of hand to maintain equity across streets against a betting range or as part of a betting range.

Reverse Implied Odds (RIO)
Hands that often win small pots or lose large pots suffer from reverse implied odds.

Popularized by Mathew Janda, a descriptor for how well a hand retains equity over streets of play.  Hands described as robust have equity that does not suffer as an opponent's range becomes stronger.  Often these hands are currently both strong and invulnerable, or have the ability to become very strong by the river, relative to the opponent's range.

Fourth and Fifth Street cards following a given flop texture.

Scale of Protection
Poker theorem which states that the more protected or strong an opponent's range is, the higher the degree of denial or retention a counter will require.

Sklansky Bucks
Dollars won (or lost) in expected value regardless of actual hand result.

Any one of many possible poker archetypes found at low stakes games.

A reraise made after a player has raised and one or more players has called in-between.

Static Board
A flop texture in which the runout is unlikely to change the order of top ranking hands. Ex: AK7r, KK4r.

A passive action followed by an aggressive action, out of position.  For example, a call followed by a lead on the next street.

Streets of Value
A crude shorthand measurement for how much betting a hand can tolerate and still be best at showdown more often than not.

Tight aggressive opponent type. Generally overused and misapplied.

TAG's Dilemma
The paradox created by having a top-heavy range played so aggressively that it misuses equity vis-à-vis position and holding.

The Great Range Fantasy
The common idea that we know our opponent’s range and frequencies precisely; most commonly seen in post-hoc analysis to justify microedge decisions.

Thin Value
A bet that is only slightly more likely to be called by worse than by better. Associated with the merged pricing construction and bet-fold lines.

Three Fundamentals
The most fundamental variables for decision making: position, stack size, and community cards.

The best hands in a given range.

Two-Way Bet
A bet that expects calls from worse hands and incorrect folds at the same time, a simultaneous value bet and bluff line.

The psychological effect of feeling like you’re losing because your stack size isn’t as large as it once was during a session, even though it’s more than what you’re in the game for.

(e.g. You bought in for $100, ran it up $450, but now only have $175 in front of you.)

A hand that has no negative card removal effects on the target range.  Bottom set, for example, unblocks top pair top kicker.

A range that is perceived to contain the nuts in any given line.  Capped ranges may become uncapped during transitions for example from preflop to flop, or flop to turn.

A turned nut straight after raising flop with a gutter.

Value Owning
Making value bets with a hand that has less than 50% equity when called.

Voluntarily Put Money In Pot (VPIP)
The frequency at which a player limps, calls, or raises preflop.

Volatile Board
A flop texture where equities will often shift on the turn and river.  See “dynamic”.

An illusory cooler where one player makes a massive mistake equity mistake and loses his stack with a strong but second best hand; also known as a Jam Basket.

Wet Board
A board texture that allows for a lot of logical hands to continue. Often made up of medium rank connected cards. Ex: KT9tt, Tc8c6s-7c-Ac.

“Walk In, Fuck Shit Up, Walk Out” a hashtag used by instagram poker players.

Winning Player
A forum poster who offers reciprocal advice under the guise of questionable positive low stakes results. A weak player or fish, in general.

Young Man Coffee. Is very much an OMC, but younger.  They usually only continue with the nuts, often under the illusion of playing a GTO style.