I don’t think poker coaching is for everyone, I just don’t see the need. There are endless sources of free information. Low cost training sites. Youtube experts (and even some real experts there, too.) On the other hand…
Hey – See the top of The Back Room for current study group offerings and private coaching. While this document is interesting, parts of it are many years old and my practice has advanced considerably since.
Contact me through one of the social media/skype/email links above, or use the form is below.
This RCP thread is full of references and updates and commentary on my coaching.
One more thing: Here’s my advice on finding poker coaching and thinking about poker training: The Poker Zoo, Ep. 16
…sometimes it’s just the best, most efficient way forward, and yes, I am available for coaching low stakes cash game players.
As a card player who plays 1/2, 1/3, 3/5, and 5/10 for a living, I have developed a somewhat independent philosophy which removes some of the mystery of the full ring. The basis is in understanding, before you sit down at the table, the nature of NLHE, still the most common game and the usual basis of a live poker win rate, and how it revolves around position, stack size, and community cards. This philosophy overlaps with GTO practice, and I in fact spend a good amount of time in solver world.
But basically, most players lose because they just don’t work or think or try very hard or even care: pretty simple.
However, if that is not you, if you are stuck and know at heart you can get there, a mentor is one of the the fast tracks out. (What’s more, if you are a bad live reg and fall into my general categories of why you are struggling, I can help you with all of the erroneous thought processes I list.)
The essence of my strategy for the game of NLHE poker is playing all my hands according to their natural alignment with position, stack size, and community cards. This is what I call synchronicity. This separates my particular style from common styles. It also means I have a basic and coherent understanding of the game and am not just clicking buttons or following some guide. I don’t pass out charts until I’m sure you understand the theory behind the charts.
This is important- and should become more important to you.
- Each spot in a ring game is valued or devalued relative to the button, the most desirable position in poker. This will in part inform how and what hands (and at what frequency) are played at the most basic level- and suggest alternatives. Critically, this dictates that when we break ranks and synchronicity, we know we have to take steps later in the hand to account for our intentional deviation or error.
- Stack size, like position, also inform what types of hands can be played most effectively. Stacks are in my view, even more important than position, and certainly more important than preflop equity, the bugaboo of many players, and one that ties them to their cards and the hopeless quest to find a perfect preflop range.
- The most complicated aspect of NLHE is postflop play because of its endless, potentially confusing action. One coherent strategy, the one that I employ, will delimit the confusion by being heavily based in points 1 and 2 rather than being focused on thin value extraction or improvisation. I focus on planned actions that interact with the fundamentals, not hopeful bet folds and other dis-coordinated actions.
I do not believe in making poker complicated; we could stop right here and move forward to winning NLHE, or in fact, almost any poker game with community cards. I do not believe you need a shelf full of poker books, especially if they frustrate and intimidate, although I encourage you to think on your own and not accept any one player or coach or writer as the ultimate authority.
Simplicity is key: all my thoughts on poker will revolve around these three complementary aspects of the game, because in the end, we are performers, not theorists. We need to be flexible and active and not weighed down with too many complex and numerous ideas. We are, above all, players.
How will coaching work?
I need to start with getting a sense of your game and/or your issues. The most successful poker coaching experience is one where we both know what we are working toward, whether it is one theme or an entire overhaul of your game.
Once we decide on what that is, I will decide whether I can help you or not. I will refer you elsewhere if we are not a good fit.
If it looks like I can help, we will agree to a month of service where we are in constant communication.
We will use Skype primarily.
If you are struggling or want to improve at 1/2 or the lowest stakes, I will very likely suggest a diagnostic session which I will analyze.
For the minority of students, especially those with highly specific challenges, our methodology will differ.
In almost all cases, we will work with theory and focus on concepts rather than hand histories.
The hourly model does not work for me and might not for you. Poker ideas take time to resonate and develop. If a mentor is what you need, you will likely have many questions and not want to feel pressured to squeeze them into an hour of my time or your time.
Lastly, students will be given access to Poker Zoo, a chat group, and the more permanent record of The Back Room, both of which we use for study, support, group discussion and transparency in my poker coaching.
Contact me for more details poker coaching (or, I suppose, other stuff) with the form below. If you need references, ask.
The above is enough to get you there. It sounds almost ridiculously simple! However, the following sub-concepts are useful for an even more nuanced understanding, which may interest you, depending on your level of play or perhaps when facing certain games, opponents and challenges. They are like filters or magnifying glasses we can use to zero in on our problems in the game, once we have a firm grasp of the three pillars.
This is inherent to playing in synchronicity with stacks and positions, and right away separates the winning player from the losing ones. Purpose trumps much. For example, many times low stakes players are overwhelmed by the poker education industry. “Be Aggressive!” “Well Not In This Spot!” “Play in Position!” “Mix It Up From the Blinds” etc. All of this – all of it- is ultimately a cover up, a well meaning pedagogical effort which never addresses the fundamental question: Do you know why you are doing what you are about to do?
Admittedly, probably not. There are no tips or top five lists or ranges to play that will make you a great player, but having purpose in all your actions might fill in some of the many blanks of a poker education.
One of the most important concepts in poker is that no matter what strategy we employ, all situations will potentially be shared by me and my opponents. Therefore it is not the situations which play themselves that are most important, but all the situations where I can find an advantage. The Construction courses in particular teach thinking about line work that fights reciprocal outcomes.
As I wrote, to win this battle of reciprocity, my strategy must preclude sharing as many of these reciprocal spots as possible. I will not be passive when they are; I will not spew when they spew. Most commonly, this can be accomplished by either shutting out my opponent from realizing his equity or choosing not to realize my own. We will always focus on the best principle of carrying combos forward – the balance of retention and denial.
The process of thinking about hands is ultimately more useful than sticking to any one tactic, even though this may not be immediately clear to a novice or intermediate player, because no situation will ever be repeated. The past is only important because the future is. There are no “standard” lines or tactics that I teach, although like every player, I have some baseline strategies that I both use and encourage. I don’t teach anyone to play like me but attempt to teach how to think in poker.
Countering Difficult Opponents and Game Conditions
One of the most profound revelations you will have as a player is the concept of Reciprocity, yet it will likely not be enough for you to completely overhaul your approach to common spots and questions. Yet there are Villains who are so good or situations so unusual or difficult that they will force us to break out of our comfort zone and derive a truly different strategy. No tactic, even open limping, feared and loathed by robotic players, the TAG industry of poker educators, and most of all, by your garden variety equity pusher, will be off the table when we come up against difficult opponents and games. Having purpose frees us from dogma and makes us stronger.
While I don’t feel qualified to instruct in games other than NLHE, I constantly play mixed games and pot limit games, not merely for enjoyment, but to expand my poker mind. I highly recommend this. Struggles in one game can point to deficiencies in another. The idea of Push/Pull in O8, for example, can make you rethink NLHE situations. If you break even at NL, but always lose at LHE, this is a strong indicator you do not understand positional alignment and is a window into improving your game right away. If you can’t seem to win at PLO, you are probably struggling with handreading, preflop considerations, and positional alignment. Natural overbetting in Stud5 and 5card draw give you insight into the math and purpose of larger than normal wagers and indifference concepts.
The Mental Aspect: Playing your “Our” Game
The most important concept in preparing oneself for the game is to realize that wherever you are at mentally, whatever you have been focusing on the most, this is what you will bring to the table. Poker is not a sport but it is a performance. We will be in the midst of the war, acting and fighting, and because of this tremendous strain our subconscious will rise to the surface almost immediately – this explains why it is such a struggle to rise to your conceptually best game.
From this vantage point, there is no A game, or B game, or C game; these are arbitrary designations that themselves could be redefined infinitely, or as is the usual case, retroactively when we are dissatisfied with ourselves. Making a good play one night and a bad one does not mean your best self arrived at the former and not the latter – all your greatest stupidities are yours to own and learn from. In reality, there is only the very best we can do at any one time… and that is our game.
The synchronicity of hands to position, stack size, and community cards is the basis of my game and a great foundation for any player who wants a straightforward strategy for winning.
If you like what you read here, we may have the basis for a beneficial, poker coaching relationship. I will want to talk mainly about the three pillars, but if you are an advanced player, or if the related concepts I think about are important or pressing to you, let me know.
Thanks for your time – Persuadeo, July 2016